Dating chat shqip

17-Jun-2017 18:50

If you want to invent a new way to categories anatomy that's different from the existing ontologies you should provide a good justification why you think the existing way of doing this isn't enough or provide references that back up the categorisation you favor. "; 2) elementy.ru: Why does a person have some organs - paired (for example, lungs, kidneys), and others - in a single copy?

Dating chat shqip-52Dating chat shqip-86

Can someone link me the discussions where this was standardized?The binary organ is intermediate between the unary/unpaired organ (the last) and the ternary organ (previous) (in accordance with the Valentin Dogiel Found: The second principle of modeling declares three of these parts, Organ, Cell and Biological macromolecule as units of structural organization of the whole (i.e., the Body).Other classes of the Anatomy Taxonomy subsume concepts that refer either to aggregates of these units (e.g., Organ system, Anatomical set, Anatomical cluster), or are parts of these units (e.g., Body part, Organ part, Cell part).I remember once reading here about a template that could restore these links, using the parent/work item to automatically link all editions, thus allowing to not only have access to other languages, but also other editions in same language. It would be very important to have this, or even an automatic feature in wikisource, to automatically link texts to all other texts linked through edition or translation of If you go up the subclass tree you find that it subclasses "Anatomical set". I wouldn't have an issue with adding an additional "antomical pair" class if you think that's necessary. --Fractaler (It's a nature of a set that all it's parts are of the same class.Being an anatomical set itself doesn't mean that it's a pair. Christian Kl (Thank you for this useful links, at once there is a weight of questions (material anatomical entity=material anatomical object? If you have two hands and a liver that's a group but no set.

Can someone link me the discussions where this was standardized?The binary organ is intermediate between the unary/unpaired organ (the last) and the ternary organ (previous) (in accordance with the Valentin Dogiel Found: The second principle of modeling declares three of these parts, Organ, Cell and Biological macromolecule as units of structural organization of the whole (i.e., the Body).Other classes of the Anatomy Taxonomy subsume concepts that refer either to aggregates of these units (e.g., Organ system, Anatomical set, Anatomical cluster), or are parts of these units (e.g., Body part, Organ part, Cell part).I remember once reading here about a template that could restore these links, using the parent/work item to automatically link all editions, thus allowing to not only have access to other languages, but also other editions in same language. It would be very important to have this, or even an automatic feature in wikisource, to automatically link texts to all other texts linked through edition or translation of If you go up the subclass tree you find that it subclasses "Anatomical set". I wouldn't have an issue with adding an additional "antomical pair" class if you think that's necessary. --Fractaler (It's a nature of a set that all it's parts are of the same class.Being an anatomical set itself doesn't mean that it's a pair. Christian Kl (Thank you for this useful links, at once there is a weight of questions (material anatomical entity=material anatomical object? If you have two hands and a liver that's a group but no set.Is it necessary to ask biology specialists from a biological project to confirm that this concept exists in biology?